“Why should I be a part of the system I dissent to? A change cannot be brought about in a tainted organization, not at least, by an individual who takes an oath under a wrongdoer”
“You consider yourself a citizen of this country, nonetheless!”
“Not only was I born in this land but raised here too. Sarcasm shall not be entertained so be urbane enough to offer grounds to your incertitude”
“The words spoken appear incoherent to me. Correct me if I fail to understand the hierarchy, but is not a citizen a part of the system?”
“Entrapping me in words here blue-stocking? I differ ideologically to the system I am born to. Not because I disagree to the constitution itself but the amendments in it. I am a rebel to the current government and the corruption that prevails under its governance”
“Seeing how passionate you are for your land, what I fail to understand is, if not incorporating yourself in the system to bring a change, why would you also not be an insurrectionist?”
“I am a follower of Lilienfeld’s Organicist Sociology. Change begins at home. If the individual constituents of a society are upright, the system would self-cleanse”
“Would you clear an ambiguity of mine about Organicism: when you compare humans in a society to cells in a being, do you consider it an ‘analogy’ or ‘homology’? For if it is ‘analogy’ and you find them physiologically similar and anatomically different, how do you explain the organizational pattern of the society; and if it is ‘homology’ and you find them structurally similar and functionally different then be kind enough to explain how the growth of an ideology would take place that shall ensure the self-cleansing”
“You are splitting hairs now. I believe in Organic growth of an inception in the society, so unlike the founder of the theory, I consider it both analogous and homologous”
“Would that make you a believer of social Darwinism as well?”
“Why should it not! Do you not acknowledge the rat race for power and fortune? Our social existence encapsulates the notion of survival only for the fittest!”
“You spend your life in misery under a social Darwinist. You abide by the law, and the changes brought to it by the parliament, that you do not believe in. You breathe in a system implemented by the dishonest, in whom you have no faith. You exist in this society at the lowest degree of the hierarchy – a small brick in the foundation – soon to fade as a nobody! You are willing to be engulfed by the fittest who shall survive on your labour. Yet you do not shake to weaken the foundation of a corrupt society! Brings me to the question I asked you before: why would you not be an insurrectionist…?”
